State thr. Lasalgaon Police Station vs Sagar Sanjay Pimpale etc 5 Advocate - Gunjal H.R. — 40/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,376(2),376(2)(j),376(2)(n),34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHNS100009922023

Hearing

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

e-Filing Number

16-09-2023

Filing Number

889/2023

Filing Date

16-09-2023

Registration No

40/2023

Registration Date

18-09-2023

Court

District Court-1 ,Niphad

Judge

1-DIST. JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESS. JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

180

Police Station

LASALGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376,376(2),376(2)(j),376(2)(n),34
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,8,12
PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT Section 9,11

Petitioner(s)

State thr. Lasalgaon Police Station

Adv. Kapse Ramesh L. APP

Respondent(s)

Sagar Sanjay Pimpale etc 5 Advocate - Gunjal H.R.

Rahul Sanjay Pimpale

Adv. Shinde Ramnath B. APP

Somnath Arjun Mali

Archana Somnath Mali

Ashabai Sanjay Pimpale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-DIST. JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESS. JUDGE

10-03-2026

Hearing

29-12-2025

Hearing

13-08-2025

Hearing

21-06-2025

Hearing

21-04-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

04-12-2023
Order on Exhibit

Bail Granted Accused Sagar Sanjay Pimpale's bail application in Special Case No.40/2023 (charges under IPC Section 376, POCSO Act, and Child Marriage Restraint Act) was allowed. He was released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, with conditions that he cannot contact the victim or threaten prosecution witnesses, and must attend court proceedings regularly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Bail Granted Accused Sagar Sanjay Pimpale's bail application in Special Case No.40/2023 (charges under IPC Section 376, POCSO Act, and Child Marriage Restraint Act) was allowed. He was released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, with conditions that he cannot contact the victim or threaten prosecution witnesses, and must attend court proceedings regularly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case