State thr. Niphd Police Station vs Vikram Ramnath Karad UTP no 1 and 3 Advocate - Mogal Vijay J — 500004/2013
Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 13(1),(17). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
Atro.Spl.Case - Special Case under Prevention of Atrocities Act
CNR: MHNS100007342013
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
500004/2013
Filing Date
10-09-2013
Registration No
500004/2013
Registration Date
10-09-2013
Court
District Court-1 ,Niphad
Judge
1-DIST. JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESS. JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
NIPHAD POLICE STATION
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State thr. Niphd Police Station
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Vikram Ramnath Karad UTP no 1 and 3 Advocate - Mogal Vijay J
Dattu Baburao Dhumal
Pralhad Baburao Dhumal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DIST. JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESS. JUDGE
Disposed
Hearing
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 02-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 18-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Court at Niphad acquitted all three accused—Vikram Ramnath Karad, Dattu Baburao Dhumal, and Pralhad Baburao Dhumal—of charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC sections 323, 504, and 506. The court found that the victim/informant turned hostile during trial, denied the alleged assault and caste-based abuse, and filed a compromise petition, leaving insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Special Court at Niphad acquitted all three accused—Vikram Ramnath Karad, Dattu Baburao Dhumal, and Pralhad Baburao Dhumal—of charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC sections 323, 504, and 506. The court found that the victim/informant turned hostile during trial, denied the alleged assault and caste-based abuse, and filed a compromise petition, leaving insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts