State thr. Saikheda Police Station vs Sharad Vasant Shinde - 5 Advocate - Gunjal Kiran T — 27/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201,34,. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHNS100006752023

Hearing

Next Hearing

12th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

734/2023

Filing Date

28-06-2023

Registration No

27/2023

Registration Date

28-06-2023

Court

District Court-1 ,Niphad

Judge

4-Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

SAIKHEDA POLICE STATION

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 302,201,34,

Petitioner(s)

State thr. Saikheda Police Station

Adv. Kapse Ramesh L. APP

Respondent(s)

Sharad Vasant Shinde - 5 Advocate - Gunjal Kiran T

Alim Latif Shaikh UTP

Adv. Pawar Sandip K

Jagdish Bhaskar Sangmnere

Adv. Pawar Sandip K

Sandeep Bhaskar Sangmnere

Adv. Pawar Sandip K

Yogesh Jagdish Sangmnere

Adv. Pawar Sandip K

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge

02-04-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

09-02-2026

Hearing

06-01-2026

Hearing

25-11-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

20-09-2024
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY The bail application of accused Alim Latif Shaikh (Accused No. 2) in Sessions Case No. 27 of 2023 has been rejected. The court found a strong prima facie case against him for murder under IPC Section 302, noting that he struck the deceased with an iron rod during a dispute, following which a co-accused beheaded the victim. Evidence including seized weapons, CCTV footage, and mobile location data supported the prosecution's case, and the court determined that releasing him on bail could lead to witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The bail application of accused Alim Latif Shaikh (Accused No. 2) in Sessions Case No. 27 of 2023 has been rejected. The court found a strong prima facie case against him for murder under IPC Section 302, noting that he struck the deceased with an iron rod during a dispute, following which a co-accused beheaded the victim. Evidence including seized weapons, CCTV footage, and mobile location data supported the prosecution's case, and the court determined that releasing him on bail could lead to witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case