State thr. Pimpalgaon Police Station vs Shaharukh Fakir Mohammad Mulani Advocate - Pophaliya Gaurav A. — 42/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,1,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHNS100003912020

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

12th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

235/2020

Filing Date

15-05-2020

Registration No

42/2020

Registration Date

15-05-2020

Court

District Court-1 ,Niphad

Judge

3-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

PIMPALGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376,1,506
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,8,12

Petitioner(s)

State thr. Pimpalgaon Police Station

Adv. AGP

Respondent(s)

Shaharukh Fakir Mohammad Mulani Advocate - Pophaliya Gaurav A.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

23-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

05-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

01-07-2020
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Bail Granted. The accused, Shahrukh Fakir Mohammad Mulani, charged under IPC Section 376(1), 506 and POCSO Act Sections 4, 8, 12 for sexual abuse of a 17-year-old girl, was granted bail of Rs. 25,000 with sureties. The court found the relationship was consensual and long-standing rather than forcible rape, citing the victim's age and natural physical attraction between teenagers. The condition imposed is that the accused must not maintain relations with the victim until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Bail Granted. The accused, Shahrukh Fakir Mohammad Mulani, charged under IPC Section 376(1), 506 and POCSO Act Sections 4, 8, 12 for sexual abuse of a 17-year-old girl, was granted bail of Rs. 25,000 with sureties. The court found the relationship was consensual and long-standing rather than forcible rape, citing the victim's age and natural physical attraction between teenagers. The condition imposed is that the accused must not maintain relations with the victim until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case