Vishal Dhondiram Kapase vs State thr. Ozar Police Station — 63/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHNS100002142026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

137/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

63/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District Court-1 ,Niphad

Judge

1-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sess. Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

269

Police Station

OZAR POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Arms Act Section 3, 25
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352, 351(2), 351(1), 3(5), 109

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishal Dhondiram Kapase

    Adv. Gaurav A Pophaliya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State thr. Ozar Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court rejected Vishal Dhondiram Kapse's second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, citing that he is a habitual offender with five prior cases, remains absconding despite the previous bail rejection, and is not cooperating with police. The court found no change in circumstances and noted that the crime weapon remains unrecovered and the accused is the main accused in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sess. Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sess. Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Vishal Dhondiram Kapse's second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, citing that he is a habitual offender with five prior cases, remains absconding despite the previous bail rejection, and is not cooperating with police. The court found no change in circumstances and noted that the crime weapon remains unrecovered and the accused is the main accused in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case