Swamil Balu Kurhade vs State thr. Niphd Police Station — 59/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--BAIL CANCELLED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS100002062026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
130/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
59/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
District Court-1 ,Niphad
Judge
2-AD-HOC DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL CANCELLED
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
NIPHAD POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Swamil Balu Kurhade
Adv. adv.swaraj sunil kunde
Respondent(s)
State thr. Niphd Police Station
Victim
Hearing History
Judge: 2-AD-HOC DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Arguments
Reply Unready
Reply Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply Unready | |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the bail application of Swamil Balu Kurhade, who was accused of sexually harassing and threatening a 13-year-old girl and her mother under serious charges including POCSO Act violations and SC/ST Atrocities Act. The judge found direct and clear allegations of repeated following and teasing of the minor victim, and determined that releasing the accused on bail during ongoing investigation would risk witness intimidation and hamper the investigation since he resides in the same locality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the bail application of Swamil Balu Kurhade, who was accused of sexually harassing and threatening a 13-year-old girl and her mother under serious charges including POCSO Act violations and SC/ST Atrocities Act. The judge found direct and clear allegations of repeated following and teasing of the minor victim, and determined that releasing the accused on bail during ongoing investigation would risk witness intimidation and hamper the investigation since he resides in the same locality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts