Sagar Asit Haldar vs State thr. Wadnerbhairav Police Station — 58/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS100002052026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
129/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
58/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
District Court-1 ,Niphad
Judge
1-DIST. JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESS. JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
135
Police Station
WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sagar Asit Haldar
Adv. Aniket Aware
Bishwajit Sudip Haldar
Adv. Aniket Aware
Hari Gobinda Haldar
Adv. Aniket Aware
Respondent(s)
State thr. Wadnerbhairav Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DIST. JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESS. JUDGE
Disposed
Arguments
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to the three accused workers in a theft case, finding the FIR was filed with inordinate delay (21 days after the alleged June 15, 2025 incident) and noting the investigating officer's evasive responses regarding CCTV evidence. The court found prima facie no substance in the case, observing it appeared to be a labor dispute (vethbigari) rather than genuine theft, and ruled that the minimal value of stolen items did not warrant indefinite detention. Each accused was released on Rs. 5,000 bail with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to the three accused workers in a theft case, finding the FIR was filed with inordinate delay (21 days after the alleged June 15, 2025 incident) and noting the investigating officer's evasive responses regarding CCTV evidence. The court found prima facie no substance in the case, observing it appeared to be a labor dispute (vethbigari) rather than genuine theft, and ruled that the minimal value of stolen items did not warrant indefinite detention. Each accused was released on Rs. 5,000 bail with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts