Sagar Asit Haldar vs State thr. Wadnerbhairav Police Station — 58/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHNS100002052026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

129/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

58/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

District Court-1 ,Niphad

Judge

1-Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sess. Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

135

Police Station

WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

1.Sagar Asit Haldar

Adv. Aniket Aware
2.Bishwajit Sudip Haldar

Adv. Aniket Aware
3.Hari Gobinda Haldar

Adv. Aniket Aware

Respondent(s)

1.State thr. Wadnerbhairav Police Station

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to the three accused workers in a theft case, finding the FIR was filed with inordinate delay (21 days after the alleged June 15, 2025 incident) and noting the investigating officer's evasive responses regarding CCTV evidence. The court found prima facie no substance in the case, observing it appeared to be a labor dispute (vethbigari) rather than genuine theft, and ruled that the minimal value of stolen items did not warrant indefinite detention. Each accused was released on Rs. 5,000 bail with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Disposed

Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sess. Judge
10-Mar-2026

Arguments

Dist. Judge-2 And Addl. Sess. Judge
05-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
04-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 58/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to the three accused workers in a theft case, finding the FIR was filed with inordinate delay (21 days after the alleged June 15, 2025 incident) and noting the investigating officer's evasive responses regarding CCTV evidence. The court found prima facie no substance in the case, observing it appeared to be a labor dispute (vethbigari) rather than genuine theft, and ruled that the minimal value of stolen items did not warrant indefinite detention. Each accused was released on Rs. 5,000 bail with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.