Afzal Anwar Pathan vs State thr. Niphd Police Station — 11/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 23rd April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHNS100001902026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District Court-1 ,Niphad

Judge

2-AD-HOC DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,

Petitioner(s)

Afzal Anwar Pathan

Adv. adv.swaraj sunil kunde

Respondent(s)

State thr. Niphd Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 2-AD-HOC DISTRICT JUDGE-1 AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

23-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

27-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

23-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the application of Afjal Anvar Pathan under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and ordered return of his seized Bajaj Discover Motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-15-FD-1290) upon execution of a Rs. 75,000 indemnity bond. The court found that given the nature of allegations, there was no need to keep the vehicle idle in police custody, as it would deteriorate. The applicant must comply with strict conditions including maintaining the vehicle in original condition, not selling or mortgaging it, producing it for investigation/trial as required, and not using it for any crime—breach of which attracts a Rs. 75,000 penalty to the Government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application of Afjal Anvar Pathan under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and ordered return of his seized Bajaj Discover Motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-15-FD-1290) upon execution of a Rs. 75,000 indemnity bond. The court found that given the nature of allegations, there was no need to keep the vehicle idle in police custody, as it would deteriorate. The applicant must comply with strict conditions including maintaining the vehicle in original condition, not selling or mortgaging it, producing it for investigation/trial as required, and not using it for any crime—breach of which attracts a Rs. 75,000 penalty to the Government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case