Mohammad Hussain Farid Shaikh vs State thr. Chandwad Police Station — 46/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS100001512026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
91/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
District Court-1 ,Niphad
Judge
1-DIST. JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESS. JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
CHANDWAD POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammad Hussain Farid Shaikh
Adv. Sachin Ghule
Sheikh Awais Rais Ahmed
Adv. Sachin Ghule
Respondent(s)
State thr. Chandwad Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DIST. JUDGE-2 AND ADDL. SESS. JUDGE
Disposed
Order
Order
Arguments
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 21-02-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Mohammad Husen Farid Shaikh and Shaikh Awais Raees Ahmad in an illegal cattle transportation case involving animal cruelty. The court found direct allegations against the accused supported by Call Details Records (CDR) showing their involvement in orchestrating the transportation of 19 cows in cruel conditions, with three cows found dead, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Mohammad Husen Farid Shaikh and Shaikh Awais Raees Ahmad in an illegal cattle transportation case involving animal cruelty. The court found direct allegations against the accused supported by Call Details Records (CDR) showing their involvement in orchestrating the transportation of 19 cows in cruel conditions, with three cows found dead, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts