Nadimuddin Aliuddin Shaikh vs State Thr. Ayeshanagar Police Stn Malegaon — 1227/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS070026992025
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
2120/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
1227/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
AYESHANAGAR POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nadimuddin Aliuddin Shaikh
Adv. Adv N P Merchant
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Thr. Ayeshanagar Police Stn Malegaon
-
2.Victim
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Nadimoddin Alliuddin Shaikh in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual offences against a minor. The judge found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in blackmailing the primary accused for ₹15 lakhs by threatening to make sexual abuse videos viral, noting his criminal history, absconding status, and need for custodial interrogation to recover the extorted amount and complete investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
04-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
02-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
27-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
25-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
23-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
20-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
13-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
12-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
10-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
05-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
03-Feb-2026
Compliance
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
30-Jan-2026
Compliance
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
27-Jan-2026
Compliance
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
24-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
22-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
19-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
14-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
13-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
08-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
06-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
03-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
01-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
30-Dec-2025
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
27-Dec-2025
Order
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
26-Dec-2025
W.S. and Say
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
24-Dec-2025
W.S. and Say
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
22-Dec-2025
W.S. and Say
District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1227/2025
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Nadimoddin Alliuddin Shaikh in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual offences against a minor. The judge found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in blackmailing the primary accused for ₹15 lakhs by threatening to make sexual abuse videos viral, noting his criminal history, absconding status, and need for custodial interrogation to recover the extorted amount and complete investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts