Nadimuddin Aliuddin Shaikh vs State Thr. Ayeshanagar Police Stn Malegaon — 1227/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHNS070026992025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-12-2025

Filing Number

2120/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

1227/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon

Judge

4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

AYESHANAGAR POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(M),351(2),356(2),308(2),3(5)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,8,12,17

Petitioner(s)

Nadimuddin Aliuddin Shaikh

Adv. Adv N P Merchant

Respondent(s)

State Thr. Ayeshanagar Police Stn Malegaon

Victim

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Order

06-03-2026

Order

04-03-2026

Order

02-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Nadimoddin Alliuddin Shaikh in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual offences against a minor. The judge found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in blackmailing the primary accused for ₹15 lakhs by threatening to make sexual abuse videos viral, noting his criminal history, absconding status, and need for custodial interrogation to recover the extorted amount and complete investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Nadimoddin Alliuddin Shaikh in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual offences against a minor. The judge found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in blackmailing the primary accused for ₹15 lakhs by threatening to make sexual abuse videos viral, noting his criminal history, absconding status, and need for custodial interrogation to recover the extorted amount and complete investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case