Samir Magan Bhujabal vs State Thr Nandgaon Police Stn — 88/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 140. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHNS070026342025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-12-2025

Filing Number

2064/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

88/2025

Registration Date

11-12-2025

Court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon

Judge

1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

518

Police Station

NANDGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 140

Petitioner(s)

Samir Magan Bhujabal

Adv. Hiray Harshal Vikas

Respondent(s)

State Thr Nandgaon Police Stn

Ashok Raghunath Patil

Daya Sunil Junnare

Shivaji Sukdeo Sonawane

Vishvajeet Gangadhar Jadhav

Avinash alias Bala Popat Kedare

Kiran Vasant Gangurde

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

18-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Judgment

10-03-2026

Judgment

07-03-2026

Arguments

02-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Sessions Judge dismissed the revision application filed by accused Samir Bhujbal against summons issued under election-related offenses (BNS sections 126(2), 189(2), 191(2), 169, 171) for allegedly obstructing voters from casting votes on election day. The court held that prima facie case was established based on complaint allegations and that issuing summons at a preliminary stage does not require detailed scrutiny of contradictions in prosecution materials—such examination is reserved for trial. The revision application was also found to be time-barred, filed 157 days after issuance versus the 90-day limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge dismissed the revision application filed by accused Samir Bhujbal against summons issued under election-related offenses (BNS sections 126(2), 189(2), 191(2), 169, 171) for allegedly obstructing voters from casting votes on election day. The court held that prima facie case was established based on complaint allegations and that issuing summons at a preliminary stage does not require detailed scrutiny of contradictions in prosecution materials—such examination is reserved for trial. The revision application was also found to be time-barred, filed 157 days after issuance versus the 90-day limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case