Samir Magan Bhujabal vs State Thr Nandgaon Police Stn — 88/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 140. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHNS070026342025
e-Filing Number
11-12-2025
Filing Number
2064/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
88/2025
Registration Date
11-12-2025
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
518
Police Station
NANDGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Samir Magan Bhujabal
Adv. Hiray Harshal Vikas
Respondent(s)
State Thr Nandgaon Police Stn
Ashok Raghunath Patil
Daya Sunil Junnare
Shivaji Sukdeo Sonawane
Vishvajeet Gangadhar Jadhav
Avinash alias Bala Popat Kedare
Kiran Vasant Gangurde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge dismissed the revision application filed by accused Samir Bhujbal against summons issued under election-related offenses (BNS sections 126(2), 189(2), 191(2), 169, 171) for allegedly obstructing voters from casting votes on election day. The court held that prima facie case was established based on complaint allegations and that issuing summons at a preliminary stage does not require detailed scrutiny of contradictions in prosecution materials—such examination is reserved for trial. The revision application was also found to be time-barred, filed 157 days after issuance versus the 90-day limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Judge dismissed the revision application filed by accused Samir Bhujbal against summons issued under election-related offenses (BNS sections 126(2), 189(2), 191(2), 169, 171) for allegedly obstructing voters from casting votes on election day. The court held that prima facie case was established based on complaint allegations and that issuing summons at a preliminary stage does not require detailed scrutiny of contradictions in prosecution materials—such examination is reserved for trial. The revision application was also found to be time-barred, filed 157 days after issuance versus the 90-day limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts