Suhas Dwarkanath Kande vs State of Maharashtra — 79/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 397. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHNS070025412025
e-Filing Number
24-11-2025
Filing Number
1996/2025
Filing Date
01-12-2025
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
01-12-2025
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suhas Dwarkanath Kande
Adv. Wasif Faiz A.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Court rejected Suhas Kande's revision application challenging the issuance of summons against him for abusing and threatening a rival political party worker. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the complaint alleging abuse and threats to life, holding that at the summoning stage only a prima facie case need be established, with detailed examination of specific words and intent reserved for trial. The court also noted the revision application was likely filed beyond the 90-day limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Court rejected Suhas Kande's revision application challenging the issuance of summons against him for abusing and threatening a rival political party worker. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the complaint alleging abuse and threats to life, holding that at the summoning stage only a prima facie case need be established, with detailed examination of specific words and intent reserved for trial. The court also noted the revision application was likely filed beyond the 90-day limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts