Suhas Dwarkanath Kande vs State of Maharashtra — 79/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 397. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHNS070025412025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-11-2025

Filing Number

1996/2025

Filing Date

01-12-2025

Registration No

79/2025

Registration Date

01-12-2025

Court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon

Judge

1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 397

Petitioner(s)

Suhas Dwarkanath Kande

Adv. Wasif Faiz A.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

18-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Judgment

10-03-2026

Judgment

07-03-2026

Arguments

04-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Additional Sessions Court rejected Suhas Kande's revision application challenging the issuance of summons against him for abusing and threatening a rival political party worker. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the complaint alleging abuse and threats to life, holding that at the summoning stage only a prima facie case need be established, with detailed examination of specific words and intent reserved for trial. The court also noted the revision application was likely filed beyond the 90-day limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court rejected Suhas Kande's revision application challenging the issuance of summons against him for abusing and threatening a rival political party worker. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the complaint alleging abuse and threats to life, holding that at the summoning stage only a prima facie case need be established, with detailed examination of specific words and intent reserved for trial. The court also noted the revision application was likely filed beyond the 90-day limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case