State Thr Nandgaon Police Stn vs Balu Popat Vaje Advocate - Shaikh Yunus R — 221/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(f)(i). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHNS070024152024
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1793/2024
Filing Date
19-11-2024
Registration No
221/2024
Registration Date
19-11-2024
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
281
Police Station
NANDGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Thr Nandgaon Police Stn
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
Balu Popat Vaje Advocate - Shaikh Yunus R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Hearing
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 06-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 23-03-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 10-03-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The second bail application filed by Balu Popat Waje under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been rejected. The accused is charged with rape (Section 64(2)(k) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) involving a blind and mentally retarded victim who is his cousin sister. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence of the offense and determined that granting bail would risk witness intimidation and absconding, making it an unfit case for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The second bail application filed by Balu Popat Waje under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been rejected. The accused is charged with rape (Section 64(2)(k) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) involving a blind and mentally retarded victim who is his cousin sister. The court found prima facie sufficient evidence of the offense and determined that granting bail would risk witness intimidation and absconding, making it an unfit case for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts