State Thr Malegaon Taluka Police Stn vs Somnath Hiraman Zinjar Advocate - Akkar Sudhir B — 224/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1). Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS070024142025
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1885/2025
Filing Date
12-11-2025
Registration No
224/2025
Registration Date
12-11-2025
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
677
Police Station
MALEGAON TALUKA POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Thr Malegaon Taluka Police Stn
Respondent(s)
Somnath Hiraman Zinjar Advocate - Akkar Sudhir B
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 17-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 06-04-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 23-03-2026 | Production of Accused | |
| 10-03-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of accused Somnath Hiraman Zinjar in Sessions Case No. 224/2025 (State of Maharashtra v. Somnath Hiraman Zinjar) has been rejected. The court found that despite primarily circumstantial evidence, the circumstances weighed against the accused—including that he was last seen with the deceased victim before the victim was found dead in the accused's well. The court considered the serious nature of the offense, risks of witness tampering given shared village residence, and that mere chargesheet filing is not automatic grounds for bail, rejecting the application on 10.12.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of accused Somnath Hiraman Zinjar in Sessions Case No. 224/2025 (State of Maharashtra v. Somnath Hiraman Zinjar) has been rejected. The court found that despite primarily circumstantial evidence, the circumstances weighed against the accused—including that he was last seen with the deceased victim before the victim was found dead in the accused's well. The court considered the serious nature of the offense, risks of witness tampering given shared village residence, and that mere chargesheet filing is not automatic grounds for bail, rejecting the application on 10.12.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts