Tahera Bano Mohammad Taha vs State Thr. Azadnagar Police Stn Malegaon — 1059/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS070023482025
e-Filing Number
03-11-2025
Filing Number
1832/2025
Filing Date
04-11-2025
Registration No
1059/2025
Registration Date
04-11-2025
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
95
Police Station
AZADNAGAR POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tahera Bano Mohammad Taha
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Aamera Bint Abdul Khalique
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Rehana Iqbal Ahmad
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Asefa Abdul Khalique
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Sayyada Mohammad Anwar
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Shabana Parvin Mohd Ismail
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Ansari Saher Bano Azizullah
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Zakiya Bano Mohd Yunus
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Najmunnisa Ahmad Ansari
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Sayayd Akhtar Sayyad Farooque
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Respondent(s)
State Thr. Azadnagar Police Stn Malegaon
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Disposed
Order
Argument of APP
Argument of APP
Argument of APP
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order | |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument of APP | |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument of APP | |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument of APP |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Malegaon granted anticipatory bail to ten sub-teachers accused of involvement in forging appointment dates (from 17.6.2013 to 1.12.2012) at a school to avoid TET examination requirements. The court found that while forgery charges exist, the applicants lacked direct involvement in the forgery, derived no financial benefit, held required qualifications at appointment, and the prosecution conceded there was no actual monetary misappropriation, making a prima facie case weak. Bail was granted on Rs.50,000 personal recognizance with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Malegaon granted anticipatory bail to ten sub-teachers accused of involvement in forging appointment dates (from 17.6.2013 to 1.12.2012) at a school to avoid TET examination requirements. The court found that while forgery charges exist, the applicants lacked direct involvement in the forgery, derived no financial benefit, held required qualifications at appointment, and the prosecution conceded there was no actual monetary misappropriation, making a prima facie case weak. Bail was granted on Rs.50,000 personal recognizance with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts