Tahera Bano Mohammad Taha vs State Thr. Azadnagar Police Stn Malegaon — 1059/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHNS070023482025

e-Filing Number

03-11-2025

Filing Number

1832/2025

Filing Date

04-Nov-2025

Registration No

1059/2025

Registration Date

04-Nov-2025

Court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon

Judge

3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

95

Police Station

AZADNAGAR POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),337,340(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tahera Bano Mohammad Taha

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

  2. 2.Aamera Bint Abdul Khalique

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

  3. 3.Rehana Iqbal Ahmad

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

  4. 4.Asefa Abdul Khalique

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

  5. 5.Sayyada Mohammad Anwar

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

  6. 6.Shabana Parvin Mohd Ismail

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

  7. 7.Ansari Saher Bano Azizullah

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

  8. 8.Zakiya Bano Mohd Yunus

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

  9. 9.Najmunnisa Ahmad Ansari

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

  10. 10.Sayayd Akhtar Sayyad Farooque

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Thr. Azadnagar Police Stn Malegaon

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Malegaon granted anticipatory bail to ten sub-teachers accused of involvement in forging appointment dates (from 17.6.2013 to 1.12.2012) at a school to avoid TET examination requirements. The court found that while forgery charges exist, the applicants lacked direct involvement in the forgery, derived no financial benefit, held required qualifications at appointment, and the prosecution conceded there was no actual monetary misappropriation, making a prima facie case weak. Bail was granted on Rs.50,000 personal recognizance with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  11. 24-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  12. 14-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  14. 22-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  16. 09-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  17. 26-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  18. 17-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  19. 10-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  20. 04-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 04-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1059/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Malegaon granted anticipatory bail to ten sub-teachers accused of involvement in forging appointment dates (from 17.6.2013 to 1.12.2012) at a school to avoid TET examination requirements. The court found that while forgery charges exist, the applicants lacked direct involvement in the forgery, derived no financial benefit, held required qualifications at appointment, and the prosecution conceded there was no actual monetary misappropriation, making a prima facie case weak. Bail was granted on Rs.50,000 personal recognizance with conditions including bi-weekly police station attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case