State Thr Jaikheda Police Stn Satana vs Kundan / Dipak Anil Shinde — 210/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,64(2)(m),137(2),351(2)(3). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS070022982025
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1786/2025
Filing Date
28-10-2025
Registration No
210/2025
Registration Date
28-10-2025
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
314
Police Station
JAYKHEDA POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Thr Jaikheda Police Stn Satana
Respondent(s)
Kundan / Dipak Anil Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 06-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 30-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 23-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 13-03-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of Kundan @ Dipak Anil Shinde has been rejected. The accused, charge-sheeted for rape of a 15-year-old minor under POCSO Act and BNS sections, was found to have prima facie sufficient evidence against him showing his involvement in the offences. The court determined that granting bail posed a risk of witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and further offences. The case is fixed for charge framing on 23/03/2026, with the prosecution ready for expedited trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of Kundan @ Dipak Anil Shinde has been rejected. The accused, charge-sheeted for rape of a 15-year-old minor under POCSO Act and BNS sections, was found to have prima facie sufficient evidence against him showing his involvement in the offences. The court determined that granting bail posed a risk of witness intimidation, evidence tampering, and further offences. The case is fixed for charge framing on 23/03/2026, with the prosecution ready for expedited trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts