Badiuzzaman Mohammad Haneef vs State Thr. Azadnagar Police Stn Malegaon — 987/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHNS070022092025

e-Filing Number

10-10-2025

Filing Number

1706/2025

Filing Date

10-Oct-2025

Registration No

987/2025

Registration Date

10-Oct-2025

Court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon

Judge

3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

95

Police Station

AZADNAGAR POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),337,340(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Badiuzzaman Mohammad Haneef

    Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Thr. Azadnagar Police Stn Malegaon

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Baiduzzaman Mohammad Haneef, a Senior Clerk accused in a forgery case involving falsified appointment dates of 11 sub-teachers at a private school. The judge found that the applicant's involvement was minimal (merely writing service books on orders), there was no financial misappropriation, and other higher-ranking accused had already been released on bail. The applicant was ordered to furnish Rs. 50,000 bail with surety and report to the investigating officer bi-monthly pending charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Argument of APP

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  11. 24-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  12. 14-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  14. 22-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  16. 09-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  17. 26-Nov-2025

    Reply on Argument

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  18. 17-Nov-2025

    Reply on Argument

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  19. 10-Nov-2025

    Reply on Argument

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  20. 03-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  21. 30-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  22. 17-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  23. 16-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-4 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegoan

  24. 10-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 10-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 987/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Baiduzzaman Mohammad Haneef, a Senior Clerk accused in a forgery case involving falsified appointment dates of 11 sub-teachers at a private school. The judge found that the applicant's involvement was minimal (merely writing service books on orders), there was no financial misappropriation, and other higher-ranking accused had already been released on bail. The applicant was ordered to furnish Rs. 50,000 bail with surety and report to the investigating officer bi-monthly pending charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case