Badiuzzaman Mohammad Haneef vs State Thr. Azadnagar Police Stn Malegaon — 987/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS070022092025
e-Filing Number
10-10-2025
Filing Number
1706/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
987/2025
Registration Date
10-10-2025
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
95
Police Station
AZADNAGAR POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Badiuzzaman Mohammad Haneef
Adv. KHALID AKHTAR MOHAMMAD YUSUF
Respondent(s)
State Thr. Azadnagar Police Stn Malegaon
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Disposed
Order
Argument of APP
Argument of APP
Argument of APP
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order | |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument of APP | |
| 27-02-2026 | Argument of APP | |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument of APP |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Baiduzzaman Mohammad Haneef, a Senior Clerk accused in a forgery case involving falsified appointment dates of 11 sub-teachers at a private school. The judge found that the applicant's involvement was minimal (merely writing service books on orders), there was no financial misappropriation, and other higher-ranking accused had already been released on bail. The applicant was ordered to furnish Rs. 50,000 bail with surety and report to the investigating officer bi-monthly pending charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Baiduzzaman Mohammad Haneef, a Senior Clerk accused in a forgery case involving falsified appointment dates of 11 sub-teachers at a private school. The judge found that the applicant's involvement was minimal (merely writing service books on orders), there was no financial misappropriation, and other higher-ranking accused had already been released on bail. The applicant was ordered to furnish Rs. 50,000 bail with surety and report to the investigating officer bi-monthly pending charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts