State Thr Satana Police Station vs Deepak Yuvraj Sonawane Advocate - Pawar Satish S. — 162/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366,366(a),376(3),376(2)(n). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHNS070019592023

Evidence

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1240/2023

Filing Date

20-09-2023

Registration No

162/2023

Registration Date

20-09-2023

Court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon

Judge

4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

FIR Details

FIR Number

340

Police Station

SATANA POLICE STATION

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 366,366(a),376(3),376(2)(n)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4(2),5(j)(2)(l),6(1)

Petitioner(s)

State Thr Satana Police Station

Adv. AGP

Respondent(s)

Deepak Yuvraj Sonawane Advocate - Pawar Satish S.

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

20-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

22-01-2026

Evidence

29-12-2025

Evidence

20-11-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

16-10-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: Bail granted to Deepak Yuvraj Sonawane (age 22) in POCSO case No. 162/2023 for offences under IPC sections 376, 376(3), 376(2)(n) and POCSO Act sections 4(2), 5(1), 6(1). The applicant must execute a ₹15,000 PR bond with one surety and comply with conditions including not tampering with prosecution witnesses and not committing similar offences. The court considered that investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and the relationship was prima facie consensual, despite the victim being 13 years 5 months old. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail granted to Deepak Yuvraj Sonawane (age 22) in POCSO case No. 162/2023 for offences under IPC sections 376, 376(3), 376(2)(n) and POCSO Act sections 4(2), 5(1), 6(1). The applicant must execute a ₹15,000 PR bond with one surety and comply with conditions including not tampering with prosecution witnesses and not committing similar offences. The court considered that investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and the relationship was prima facie consensual, despite the victim being 13 years 5 months old. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case