State Thr Wadner Khakurdi Police Stn vs Samadhan Kailas Pawar Advocate - Salve Sunil E. — 117/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363.366S,376,342,323,506. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS070017912024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1295/2024
Filing Date
17-08-2024
Registration No
117/2024
Registration Date
17-08-2024
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
273
Police Station
WADNER KHAKURDI POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Thr Wadner Khakurdi Police Stn
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
Samadhan Kailas Pawar Advocate - Salve Sunil E.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application to cancel Condition No. 2(iv) of the bail order dated 07/07/2025 has been rejected. The accused sought cancellation claiming he needed to reside with his ailing mother in village Ravalgaon, but the court found the condition does not prohibit him from entering the village or visiting his residence—it only restricts contact with the victim, informant, and their premises. The court maintained the original bail condition to protect the minor victim and prevent witness intimidation in this POCSO case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application to cancel Condition No. 2(iv) of the bail order dated 07/07/2025 has been rejected. The accused sought cancellation claiming he needed to reside with his ailing mother in village Ravalgaon, but the court found the condition does not prohibit him from entering the village or visiting his residence—it only restricts contact with the victim, informant, and their premises. The court maintained the original bail condition to protect the minor victim and prevent witness intimidation in this POCSO case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts