State Thr Satana Police Station vs Ravindra Shankar Gaikwad Advocate - Wasif Faiz A. — 104/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(3),506. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHNS070011902021

Evidence

Next Hearing

13th May 2026

e-Filing Number

31-07-2021

Filing Number

666/2021

Filing Date

31-07-2021

Registration No

104/2021

Registration Date

31-07-2021

Court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon

Judge

4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

FIR Details

FIR Number

393

Police Station

SATANA POLICE STATION

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376(3),506
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,5c,6,8,12

Petitioner(s)

State Thr Satana Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ravindra Shankar Gaikwad Advocate - Wasif Faiz A.

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon

22-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Evidence

24-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

05-08-2021
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The bail application filed by Ravindra Shankar Gaikwad under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in Crime No. I-393/2021 for offences under IPC Sections 376(3), 506 and POCSO Act sections has been rejected. The accused was charged with sexually exploiting a woman whose parents are blind by falsely promising marriage and shelter. The Additional Sessions Judge held that given the serious nature of the allegations and circumstances, the accused was not entitled to bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The bail application filed by Ravindra Shankar Gaikwad under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in Crime No. I-393/2021 for offences under IPC Sections 376(3), 506 and POCSO Act sections has been rejected. The accused was charged with sexually exploiting a woman whose parents are blind by falsely promising marriage and shelter. The Additional Sessions Judge held that given the serious nature of the allegations and circumstances, the accused was not entitled to bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Malegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case