State Thr Nandgaon Police Stn vs Samadhan @ Sambhaji Shivaji Mali Advocate - Asif parvej — 88/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(AB). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHNS070005862020
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
405/2020
Filing Date
08-07-2020
Registration No
88/2020
Registration Date
08-07-2020
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
251
Police Station
NANDGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Thr Nandgaon Police Stn
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Samadhan @ Sambhaji Shivaji Mali Advocate - Asif parvej
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The accused's application seeking copies of witness statements recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code and a copy of a DVD was rejected. The court found no such statements existed on record (only empty packets were present) and held that no legal provision entitled the accused to obtain a copy of the DVD, especially since the accused had already received copies of witness statements under Section 161. The application was dismissed outright on 18.04.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The accused's application seeking copies of witness statements recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code and a copy of a DVD was rejected. The court found no such statements existed on record (only empty packets were present) and held that no legal provision entitled the accused to obtain a copy of the DVD, especially since the accused had already received copies of witness statements under Section 161. The application was dismissed outright on 18.04.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts