MANIK TULSHIRAM AVHAD vs State Thr Satana Police Station — 186/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS070004622026
e-Filing Number
10-02-2026
Filing Number
332/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
186/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
785
Police Station
SATANA POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANIK TULSHIRAM AVHAD
Adv. Ansari mohd salman rizwan ahmad
Respondent(s)
State Thr Satana Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Disposed
Order
Order
Arguments
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order | |
| 02-03-2026 | Order | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Malegaon granted regular bail to Manik Tulshiram Avhad (accused No. 9) in a counterfeit currency case (Crime No. 785/2025 under Sections 179, 180 BNS 2023). The court found that while the applicant had criminal antecedents and was involved in supplying counterfeit currency, grounds for bail were justified because: he had been in custody for over two months with sufficient investigation opportunity, no recovery was made from him personally, other co-accused had already been released on bail, and he had firm roots in society with no flight risk. He was released on Rs. 50,000 personal recognizance and surety bond with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Malegaon granted regular bail to Manik Tulshiram Avhad (accused No. 9) in a counterfeit currency case (Crime No. 785/2025 under Sections 179, 180 BNS 2023). The court found that while the applicant had criminal antecedents and was involved in supplying counterfeit currency, grounds for bail were justified because: he had been in custody for over two months with sufficient investigation opportunity, no recovery was made from him personally, other co-accused had already been released on bail, and he had firm roots in society with no flight risk. He was released on Rs. 50,000 personal recognizance and surety bond with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts