State Thr Malegaon Taluka Police Stn vs Shankar Bhaskar Ghodeswar Other 01 Advocate - Shaikh Faizal M. — 22/2022
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20B,20C,22. Status: Fixing date of Hearing. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS070003982022
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
199/2022
Filing Date
03-03-2022
Registration No
22/2022
Registration Date
03-03-2022
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
784
Police Station
MALEGAON TALUKA POLICE STATION
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Thr Malegaon Taluka Police Stn
Adv. APP Pagare Ashok N
Respondent(s)
Shankar Bhaskar Ghodeswar Other 01 Advocate - Shaikh Faizal M.
Pawan Balkrushna Kshirsagar
Adv. Godse Suresh G
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Hearing
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing | |
| 05-01-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing | |
| 13-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 19-09-2025 | Hearing | |
| 13-08-2025 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Summary: The second bail application filed by accused no.1 under Section 439 CrPC in Sessions Case No. 22 of 2022 has been rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found no substantial change in circumstances since the first bail application was denied and held that the accused's criminal antecedents (8 registered crimes), prima facie case under NDPS Act Sections 20(b), 20(c) & 22, and unsubstantiated claim of brain ailment do not warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The second bail application filed by accused no.1 under Section 439 CrPC in Sessions Case No. 22 of 2022 has been rejected. The Additional Sessions Judge found no substantial change in circumstances since the first bail application was denied and held that the accused's criminal antecedents (8 registered crimes), prima facie case under NDPS Act Sections 20(b), 20(c) & 22, and unsubstantiated claim of brain ailment do not warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts