Santosh Sonu Gavali vs State Thr. C Police Stn Malegaon — 168/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS070003762026
e-Filing Number
04-02-2026
Filing Number
281/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
168/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
MALEGAON CAMP POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santosh Sonu Gavali
Adv. Sudhir Akkar
Bharati Sonu Gavali
Adv. Sudhir Akkar
Kunal Subhash Gavali
Adv. Sudhir Akkar
Prem Lakshman Yadav
Adv. Sudhir Akkar
Tonya Urf Gajanan Laddu Yadav
Adv. Sudhir Akkar
Respondent(s)
State Thr. C Police Stn Malegaon
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to five accused in a family dispute case arising from a post-death ritual function where the deceased's wife and her relatives were not invited and subsequently assaulted with utensils. The judge found that since the hosts had discretion over invitations, the incident stemmed from a family matter with no criminal antecedents of the accused, and further investigation could proceed without custodial detention. Each accused was released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including weekly police station attendance and restrictions on witness intimidation or evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to five accused in a family dispute case arising from a post-death ritual function where the deceased's wife and her relatives were not invited and subsequently assaulted with utensils. The judge found that since the hosts had discretion over invitations, the incident stemmed from a family matter with no criminal antecedents of the accused, and further investigation could proceed without custodial detention. Each accused was released on bail of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including weekly police station attendance and restrictions on witness intimidation or evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts