Rajiv Panditrao Mhaskar vs State Thr. Chavani Police Stn Malegaon — 121/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS070002692026
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
24-01-2026
Filing Number
205/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
121/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
MALEGAON CHAWANI POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajiv Panditrao Mhaskar
Adv. DEORE SANJEEV KUMAR BAPU
Respondent(s)
State Thr. Chavani Police Stn Malegaon
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Criminal Bail Application No. 121 of 2026 (Rajiv Panditrao Mhaskar vs. State of Maharashtra), the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon allowed the complainant Shekhar Ashok Patil's application to intervene in the anticipatory bail proceedings. The court held that despite the complainant not being a statutory "victim" under Section 2(1)(y) of B.N.S.S. 2023, complainants have a fundamental right to make oral submissions in bail applications as established in precedent law (Vinay Potdar case). The court permitted the complainant to state his version during the bail hearing arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Criminal Bail Application No. 121 of 2026 (Rajiv Panditrao Mhaskar vs. State of Maharashtra), the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon allowed the complainant Shekhar Ashok Patil's application to intervene in the anticipatory bail proceedings. The court held that despite the complainant not being a statutory "victim" under Section 2(1)(y) of B.N.S.S. 2023, complainants have a fundamental right to make oral submissions in bail applications as established in precedent law (Vinay Potdar case). The court permitted the complainant to state his version during the bail hearing arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts