Sunil Madhavrao Wadge vs State Thr. Chavani Police Stn Malegaon — 119/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHNS070002672026
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
24-01-2026
Filing Number
203/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
119/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
MALEGAON CHAWANI POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Madhavrao Wadge
Adv. DEORE SANJEEV KUMAR BAPU
Ahire Jibhau Raghunath
Respondent(s)
State Thr. Chavani Police Stn Malegaon
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the complainant Shekhar Ashok Patil's application to intervene in the anticipatory bail proceedings of Sunil Madhavrao Wadge. The court held that despite the complainant not being technically a "victim" under Section 2(1)(y) of B.N.S.S. 2023, complainants have a legal right to make oral submissions in bail applications, relying on precedent in Vinay Potdar v. State of Maharashtra. The complainant was permitted to state his version during the bail hearing arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the complainant Shekhar Ashok Patil's application to intervene in the anticipatory bail proceedings of Sunil Madhavrao Wadge. The court held that despite the complainant not being technically a "victim" under Section 2(1)(y) of B.N.S.S. 2023, complainants have a legal right to make oral submissions in bail applications, relying on precedent in Vinay Potdar v. State of Maharashtra. The complainant was permitted to state his version during the bail hearing arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts