State Thr Pawarwadi Police Stn, Malegaon vs Tausif Ahmad Rafique Ahmad @ Raju Advocate - TAUSEEF ANJUM ABDUS SALEEM ANSARI — 21/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,34,120(B). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHNS070002272023
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
152/2023
Filing Date
06-02-2023
Registration No
21/2023
Registration Date
07-02-2023
Court
District Court-1 ,Malegaon
Judge
1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
171
Police Station
PAWARWADI POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Thr Pawarwadi Police Stn, Malegaon
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tausif Ahmad Rafique Ahmad @ Raju Advocate - TAUSEEF ANJUM ABDUS SALEEM ANSARI
Akil Ahmad Mohammad Sugrati @ Papa
Adv. parvez Aasif
Shaikh Asif Shaikh Lukman
Adv. Parvez Asif
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Sessions Case No. 21/2023 | State vs. Taussif Ahmed Raffique Ahmed @ Raju & Ors. The application by accused no. 1 for a copy of CCTV footage was allowed. The court held that despite the footage being played during trial, the prosecution's failure to provide it earlier violated Section 207 CrPC, and the accused is entitled to a copy for proper defense and cross-examination of witnesses. The System Manager is directed to create a clone copy of the CCTV footage in the presence of both counsels, with a report to be submitted by 20.09.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Sessions Case No. 21/2023 | State vs. Taussif Ahmed Raffique Ahmed @ Raju & Ors. The application by accused no. 1 for a copy of CCTV footage was allowed. The court held that despite the footage being played during trial, the prosecution's failure to provide it earlier violated Section 207 CrPC, and the accused is entitled to a copy for proper defense and cross-examination of witnesses. The System Manager is directed to create a clone copy of the CCTV footage in the presence of both counsels, with a report to be submitted by 20.09.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts