State ExciseNashik vs Krushna Bhaskar Pawar Advocate - Gujrathi Kailash K. — 5999/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65d,e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS050076032025

Filing Number

7559/2025

Filing Date

15-Dec-2025

Registration No

5999/2025

Registration Date

15-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Nashikroad

Judge

3-2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65d,e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State ExciseNashik

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Krushna Bhaskar Pawar Advocate - Gujrathi Kailash K.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Nashik Road Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Krushna Bhaskar Pawar from charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Sec. 65(d)(e)) because the prosecution failed to produce the required Chemical Analyzer report, making it impossible to proceed with the case. The proceedings were stopped under CrPC Section 258, the bail bond was cancelled, and seized property was directed to the Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5999/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Nashik Road Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Krushna Bhaskar Pawar from charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Sec. 65(d)(e)) because the prosecution failed to produce the required Chemical Analyzer report, making it impossible to proceed with the case. The proceedings were stopped under CrPC Section 258, the bail bond was cancelled, and seized property was directed to the Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case