Kailas Keshav Dhatrak vs Ranjana Ramesh Hans — 488/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS050014772022

Filing Number

1247/2022

Filing Date

24-Aug-2022

Registration No

488/2022

Registration Date

24-Aug-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Nashikroad

Judge

1-IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kailas Keshav Dhatrak

    Adv. Rao Vikram K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ranjana Ramesh Hans

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  3. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  6. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  7. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  8. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  9. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  10. 24-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The application under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act for interim compensation was partly allowed. The accused (Ranjana Hans) is directed to pay 10% of the cheque amount (Rs. 1,65,000) to the complainant (Kailas Dhatrak) as interim compensation within 60 days, instead of the requested 20%, as the court found prima facie evidence that a dishonored cheque of Rs. 16,50,000 was issued by the accused despite notice of dishonor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  12. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    III Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC.

  13. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    IV Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  14. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    III Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC.

  15. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    III Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC.

  16. 28-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    III Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC.

  17. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  18. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  19. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  20. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  21. 25-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  22. 20-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  23. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  24. 08-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  25. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  26. 02-Nov-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  27. 21-Aug-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  28. 23-Jun-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  29. 22-May-2023

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  30. 17-Apr-2023

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  31. 10-Apr-2023

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  32. 03-Mar-2023

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

  33. 03-Jan-2023

    B.W._Unready

    2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  34. 03-Dec-2022

    B.W._Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  35. 12-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  36. 03-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  37. 04-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  38. 02-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 24-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 488/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act for interim compensation was partly allowed. The accused (Ranjana Hans) is directed to pay 10% of the cheque amount (Rs. 1,65,000) to the complainant (Kailas Dhatrak) as interim compensation within 60 days, instead of the requested 20%, as the court found prima facie evidence that a dishonored cheque of Rs. 16,50,000 was issued by the accused despite notice of dishonor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case