State of Maharashtra. vs Bilal Ali Hussain Shaikh — 204/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115,3(5). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS050013822025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1341/2025
Filing Date
22-03-2025
Registration No
204/2025
Registration Date
25-03-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Nashikroad
Judge
3-2nd JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
FIR Details
FIR Number
597
Police Station
NASHIK ROAD POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra.
Respondent(s)
Bilal Ali Hussain Shaikh
Tofik Abul Husen Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd JT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Evidence
Order on Exh
Reply Unready
Reply Unready
Reply Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Reply Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State Vs Bilal Ali Hussain Shaikh (R.C.C. No. 204/2025) Outcome: The discharge application filed by accused No.2 Taufik Abdul Hussain Khan has been rejected. The court found sufficient prima facie material establishing his involvement in the assault case and proceeded to frame charges against him under Sections 118(1), 115(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court rejected his contention that co-accused No.1's confessional statement absolving him was sufficient grounds for discharge, holding that such evidence is weak and its value must be tested at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State Vs Bilal Ali Hussain Shaikh (R.C.C. No. 204/2025) Outcome: The discharge application filed by accused No.2 Taufik Abdul Hussain Khan has been rejected. The court found sufficient prima facie material establishing his involvement in the assault case and proceeded to frame charges against him under Sections 118(1), 115(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court rejected his contention that co-accused No.1's confessional statement absolving him was sufficient grounds for discharge, holding that such evidence is weak and its value must be tested at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts