Lina Anantrao Ranshur vs State of Maharashtra. Advocate - APP Chavan Rasika N. — 53/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHNS050012332026
e-Filing Number
19-02-2026
Filing Number
1233/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Nashikroad
Judge
3-2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lina Anantrao Ranshur
Adv. Vidhi Kailash Gujarathi
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra. Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) Chavan Rasika N.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed Lina Anantrao Ranshur's application to release her seized Mahindra vehicle used in an alleged Maharashtra Animal Protection Act violation, finding her to be the registered owner entitled to possession. The vehicle was released upon executing a ₹2,00,000 indemnity bond and undertaking not to alter the property or create third-party interests, with photographic documentation and panchanama prepared by the investigating officer to preserve evidence for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
10-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
2nd Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2026
The court allowed Lina Anantrao Ranshur's application to release her seized Mahindra vehicle used in an alleged Maharashtra Animal Protection Act violation, finding her to be the registered owner entitled to possession. The vehicle was released upon executing a ₹2,00,000 indemnity bond and undertaking not to alter the property or create third-party interests, with photographic documentation and panchanama prepared by the investigating officer to preserve evidence for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts