State Ambad Police stn Nashik vs Sham Ashok Angre — 339/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2), 64(1). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS010083322025
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4020/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
339/2025
Registration Date
11-12-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
FIR Details
FIR Number
710
Police Station
AMBAD POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Ambad Police stn Nashik
Adv. App Sonawane Shailesh H
Respondent(s)
Sham Ashok Angre
Hearing History
Judge: 10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
BAIL DENIED The Special (POCSO) Judge at Nashik rejected the bail application of 19-year-old Sham Ashok Angre in a case involving alleged penetrative sexual assault on a 17-year-old minor. The court found the victim's statement credible, establishing forceful sexual assault rather than a consensual relationship, and noted that granting bail posed a risk of threat or inducement to the minor victim. This was the accused's second bail application, with no material change in circumstances since the first rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL DENIED The Special (POCSO) Judge at Nashik rejected the bail application of 19-year-old Sham Ashok Angre in a case involving alleged penetrative sexual assault on a 17-year-old minor. The court found the victim's statement credible, establishing forceful sexual assault rather than a consensual relationship, and noted that granting bail posed a risk of threat or inducement to the minor victim. This was the accused's second bail application, with no material change in circumstances since the first rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts