BHAGIRATH FARM PVT LTD Through authorized person Shri Abhishek Narendra Thakkar vs XLO India Pvt Ltd Through Smt Arati Saran — 114/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43R11. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHNS010079382025
e-Filing Number
26-11-2025
Filing Number
4311/2025
Filing Date
26-11-2025
Registration No
114/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
5-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAGIRATH FARM PVT LTD Through authorized person Shri Abhishek Narendra Thakkar
Adv. INGALE BHAUSAHEB PANDITRAO
Respondent(s)
XLO India Pvt Ltd Through Smt Arati Saran
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation
Hearing History
Judge: 5-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Court at Nashik partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's order that had granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from terminating a 95-year industrial land lease. The appellate court found the trial court erred by failing to first address a territorial jurisdiction objection (the lease deed stipulated Mumbai courts' jurisdiction) before granting interim relief, and by not properly considering the MIDC Circular of 2008, which limits open-space allotments to 5 years only for operational entrepreneurs. The matter was remitted to the trial court for fresh adjudication of the jurisdiction issue within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court at Nashik partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's order that had granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from terminating a 95-year industrial land lease. The appellate court found the trial court erred by failing to first address a territorial jurisdiction objection (the lease deed stipulated Mumbai courts' jurisdiction) before granting interim relief, and by not properly considering the MIDC Circular of 2008, which limits open-space allotments to 5 years only for operational entrepreneurs. The matter was remitted to the trial court for fresh adjudication of the jurisdiction issue within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts