BHAGIRATH FARM PVT LTD Through authorized person Shri Abhishek Narendra Thakkar vs XLO India Pvt Ltd Through Smt Arati Saran — 114/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43R11. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHNS010079382025
e-Filing Number
26-11-2025
Filing Number
4311/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
114/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
5-District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAGIRATH FARM PVT LTD Through authorized person Shri Abhishek Narendra Thakkar
Adv. INGALE BHAUSAHEB PANDITRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.XLO India Pvt Ltd Through Smt Arati Saran
-
2.Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The District Court at Nashik partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's order that had granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from terminating a 95-year industrial land lease. The appellate court found the trial court erred by failing to first address a territorial jurisdiction objection (the lease deed stipulated Mumbai courts' jurisdiction) before granting interim relief, and by not properly considering the MIDC Circular of 2008, which limits open-space allotments to 5 years only for operational entrepreneurs. The matter was remitted to the trial court for fresh adjudication of the jurisdiction issue within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgment
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
12-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
03-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
22-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
17-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
05-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
24-Dec-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
11-Dec-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
06-Dec-2025
First Order
District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
29-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 114/2025
Summary The District Court at Nashik partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's order that had granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from terminating a 95-year industrial land lease. The appellate court found the trial court erred by failing to first address a territorial jurisdiction objection (the lease deed stipulated Mumbai courts' jurisdiction) before granting interim relief, and by not properly considering the MIDC Circular of 2008, which limits open-space allotments to 5 years only for operational entrepreneurs. The matter was remitted to the trial court for fresh adjudication of the jurisdiction issue within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts