BHAGIRATH FARM PVT LTD Through authorized person Shri Abhishek Narendra Thakkar vs XLO India Pvt Ltd Through Smt Arati Saran — 114/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43R11. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHNS010079382025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-11-2025

Filing Number

4311/2025

Filing Date

26-11-2025

Registration No

114/2025

Registration Date

28-11-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

5-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section O43R11

Petitioner(s)

BHAGIRATH FARM PVT LTD Through authorized person Shri Abhishek Narendra Thakkar

Adv. INGALE BHAUSAHEB PANDITRAO

Respondent(s)

XLO India Pvt Ltd Through Smt Arati Saran

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation

Hearing History

Judge: 5-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

24-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Judgment

16-03-2026

Arguments

13-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The District Court at Nashik partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's order that had granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from terminating a 95-year industrial land lease. The appellate court found the trial court erred by failing to first address a territorial jurisdiction objection (the lease deed stipulated Mumbai courts' jurisdiction) before granting interim relief, and by not properly considering the MIDC Circular of 2008, which limits open-space allotments to 5 years only for operational entrepreneurs. The matter was remitted to the trial court for fresh adjudication of the jurisdiction issue within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court at Nashik partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court's order that had granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from terminating a 95-year industrial land lease. The appellate court found the trial court erred by failing to first address a territorial jurisdiction objection (the lease deed stipulated Mumbai courts' jurisdiction) before granting interim relief, and by not properly considering the MIDC Circular of 2008, which limits open-space allotments to 5 years only for operational entrepreneurs. The matter was remitted to the trial court for fresh adjudication of the jurisdiction issue within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case