Damodar Dagdu Pagere vs Arbitrator Maratha Vidya Prasarak Samaj Advocate - Zoman Amod S. — 422/2022
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Awaiting R and P. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
Arbitration Case
CNR: MHNS010073072022
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4174/2022
Filing Date
03-12-2022
Registration No
422/2022
Registration Date
05-12-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Damodar Dagdu Pagere
Adv. Salve Rajendra G.
Respondent(s)
Arbitrator Maratha Vidya Prasarak Samaj Advocate - Zoman Amod S.
Maratha Vidya Prasarak Samaj Nashik
Adv. Walunj Uttam P.
May.Chairman Election Board
Sandeep Gopalrao Gulve
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Awaiting R and P
Awaiting R and P
Awaiting R and P
Awaiting R and P
Awaiting R and P
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Awaiting R and P | |
| 30-03-2026 | Awaiting R and P | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting R and P | |
| 06-02-2026 | Awaiting R and P | |
| 09-01-2026 | Awaiting R and P |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court rejected the society's application seeking dismissal of an arbitration appeal under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Although the society's election rules (Rule 35) purported to bar members from seeking court redressal against election decisions, the court held that this restriction conflicts with public policy and the right of appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996. The appellant's right to challenge the arbitral award on grounds of public policy violation cannot be completely barred by internal society rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court rejected the society's application seeking dismissal of an arbitration appeal under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Although the society's election rules (Rule 35) purported to bar members from seeking court redressal against election decisions, the court held that this restriction conflicts with public policy and the right of appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996. The appellant's right to challenge the arbitral award on grounds of public policy violation cannot be completely barred by internal society rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts