Damodar Dagdu Pagere vs Arbitrator Maratha Vidya Prasarak Samaj Advocate - Zoman Amod S. — 422/2022

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Awaiting R and P. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Arbitration Case

CNR: MHNS010073072022

Awaiting R and P

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4174/2022

Filing Date

03-12-2022

Registration No

422/2022

Registration Date

05-12-2022

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Damodar Dagdu Pagere

Adv. Salve Rajendra G.

Respondent(s)

Arbitrator Maratha Vidya Prasarak Samaj Advocate - Zoman Amod S.

Maratha Vidya Prasarak Samaj Nashik

Adv. Walunj Uttam P.

May.Chairman Election Board

Sandeep Gopalrao Gulve

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

21-04-2026

Awaiting R and P

30-03-2026

Awaiting R and P

10-03-2026

Awaiting R and P

06-02-2026

Awaiting R and P

09-01-2026

Awaiting R and P

Interim Orders

02-09-2023
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY: The court rejected the society's application seeking dismissal of an arbitration appeal under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Although the society's election rules (Rule 35) purported to bar members from seeking court redressal against election decisions, the court held that this restriction conflicts with public policy and the right of appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996. The appellant's right to challenge the arbitral award on grounds of public policy violation cannot be completely barred by internal society rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court rejected the society's application seeking dismissal of an arbitration appeal under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Although the society's election rules (Rule 35) purported to bar members from seeking court redressal against election decisions, the court held that this restriction conflicts with public policy and the right of appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996. The appellant's right to challenge the arbitral award on grounds of public policy violation cannot be completely barred by internal society rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case