State Igatpuri Police stn Nashik vs Rehan Ankush Shingole — 258/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS010069182024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3240/2024
Filing Date
23-09-2024
Registration No
258/2024
Registration Date
23-09-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
165
Police Station
IGATPURI POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Igatpuri Police stn Nashik
Adv. Misar Ajay S. DGP.
Respondent(s)
Rehan Ankush Shingole
Hearing History
Judge: 10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 09-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Special POCSO Judge in Nashik acquitted Rohan Ankush Shingole of charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and related statutes, finding the prosecution failed to prove forceful sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while the victim was technically a minor (18 years 5 months old) when she left home, she and the accused were in a consensual love relationship, later married, and are currently cohabiting—establishing no criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Special POCSO Judge in Nashik acquitted Rohan Ankush Shingole of charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and related statutes, finding the prosecution failed to prove forceful sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while the victim was technically a minor (18 years 5 months old) when she left home, she and the accused were in a consensual love relationship, later married, and are currently cohabiting—establishing no criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts