State Bhadrakali Police stn Nashik vs Shaharukh Akthar Ansari Advocate - Gangurde Yogesh V. — 268/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64, 74, 137(2), 351(2). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS010066302025
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3245/2025
Filing Date
09-10-2025
Registration No
268/2025
Registration Date
09-10-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
FIR Details
FIR Number
279
Police Station
BHADRAKALI POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bhadrakali Police stn Nashik
Adv. App Sonawane Shailesh H
Respondent(s)
Shaharukh Akthar Ansari Advocate - Gangurde Yogesh V.
Hearing History
Judge: 10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
BAIL DENIED The Special (POCSO) Judge, Nashik rejected the second bail application of accused Shahrukh Akhatar Ansari in a POCSO case involving allegations of sexual assault against a minor victim through blackmail and coercion. The court found the allegations serious based on victim statements, witness testimony, and medical evidence, holding that completion of investigation and filing of chargesheet alone cannot justify bail in such grave cases involving threat to victim safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL DENIED The Special (POCSO) Judge, Nashik rejected the second bail application of accused Shahrukh Akhatar Ansari in a POCSO case involving allegations of sexual assault against a minor victim through blackmail and coercion. The court found the allegations serious based on victim statements, witness testimony, and medical evidence, holding that completion of investigation and filing of chargesheet alone cannot justify bail in such grave cases involving threat to victim safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts