bhushan manohar Nikam vs ASHIQ HUSSAIN ABAS HUSSAIN SHAIKH — 134/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHNS010065702025
e-Filing Number
06-10-2025
Filing Number
3208/2025
Filing Date
06-10-2025
Registration No
134/2025
Registration Date
09-10-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
4-DISTRICT JUDGE-7 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
bhushan manohar Nikam
Adv. Amol Gajendra Sanap
Sushil Ashok Nemane
Respondent(s)
ASHIQ HUSSAIN ABAS HUSSAIN SHAIKH
On behalf of the Government of Maharashtra, D. G. P. Nashik
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-7 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by two doctors (an oncologist and radiologist) accused under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of their discharge application, finding prima facie evidence to proceed with charges based on witness testimony regarding non-compliance with PCPNDT regulations, particularly the failure to report installation of a new CT Scan machine and improper use of diagnostic equipment without proper authorization documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by two doctors (an oncologist and radiologist) accused under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of their discharge application, finding prima facie evidence to proceed with charges based on witness testimony regarding non-compliance with PCPNDT regulations, particularly the failure to report installation of a new CT Scan machine and improper use of diagnostic equipment without proper authorization documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts