bhushan manohar Nikam vs ASHIQ HUSSAIN ABAS HUSSAIN SHAIKH — 134/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHNS010065702025
e-Filing Number
06-10-2025
Filing Number
3208/2025
Filing Date
06-Oct-2025
Registration No
134/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
4-District Judge-7 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.bhushan manohar Nikam
Adv. Amol Gajendra Sanap
-
2.Sushil Ashok Nemane
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHIQ HUSSAIN ABAS HUSSAIN SHAIKH
-
2.On behalf of the Government of Maharashtra, D. G. P. Nashik
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by two doctors (an oncologist and radiologist) accused under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of their discharge application, finding prima facie evidence to proceed with charges based on witness testimony regarding non-compliance with PCPNDT regulations, particularly the failure to report installation of a new CT Scan machine and improper use of diagnostic equipment without proper authorization documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-7 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-7 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-7 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
20-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
18-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
16-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
11-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
30-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
27-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
21-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
01-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
28-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
25-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
17-Nov-2025
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Nov-2025
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
07-Nov-2025
Notice_Unready
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
15-Oct-2025
Notice_Unready
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 134/2025
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by two doctors (an oncologist and radiologist) accused under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of their discharge application, finding prima facie evidence to proceed with charges based on witness testimony regarding non-compliance with PCPNDT regulations, particularly the failure to report installation of a new CT Scan machine and improper use of diagnostic equipment without proper authorization documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts