Sopan Serjerao Sonwane vs Ramesh Khanderao Kale Advocate - Ashtaputre Sharad G. — 950/2023
Case under Amritsar Oil Works (acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHNS010062722023
e-Filing Number
24-09-2023
Filing Number
3141/2023
Filing Date
25-09-2023
Registration No
950/2023
Registration Date
05-10-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sopan Serjerao Sonwane
Adv. Vighne Anil N.
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Khanderao Kale Advocate - Ashtaputre Sharad G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nashik awarded Rs. 3,45,200 in compensation to petitioner Sopan Sarjerao Sonawane, a 43-year-old bakery product supplier who sustained 20% permanent disability from a May 2023 road accident caused by negligent truck driving. The tribunal held both the vehicle owner and insurer (ICICI Lombard) jointly and severally liable, rejecting the insurer's defense regarding policy breach and dismissing the delay in filing the FIR as immaterial to the claim's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nashik awarded Rs. 3,45,200 in compensation to petitioner Sopan Sarjerao Sonawane, a 43-year-old bakery product supplier who sustained 20% permanent disability from a May 2023 road accident caused by negligent truck driving. The tribunal held both the vehicle owner and insurer (ICICI Lombard) jointly and severally liable, rejecting the insurer's defense regarding policy breach and dismissing the delay in filing the FIR as immaterial to the claim's validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts