Rajendra Laxman Ghayal vs The Divisional Manager MSRTC Advocate - Nanavare Babasaheb D. — 914/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 164. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Defence Evidence Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHNS010056002021

Filing Number

3159/2021

Filing Date

25-Oct-2021

Registration No

914/2021

Registration Date

30-Oct-2021

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 164

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajendra Laxman Ghayal

    Adv. Sayyed Hussain B

  2. 2.Prashant Rajendra Ghayal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Divisional Manager MSRTC Advocate - Nanavare Babasaheb D.

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  10. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  12. 26-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nashik allowed the application (Exh.16) to add the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner Rajendra Laxman Ghayal (who died on 27.01.2025) as parties to the case against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. The legal heirs must be added on record within the stipulated time and file an amended petition to be supplied to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 08-Aug-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Principal District And Sessions Judge, Nashik

  15. 16-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  16. 22-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  17. 27-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  18. 13-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  19. 01-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  20. 11-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  21. 10-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  22. 27-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  23. 05-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  24. 08-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  25. 11-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  26. 03-May-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  27. 18-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  28. 22-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  29. 27-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  30. 07-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  31. 24-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  32. 09-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  33. 28-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  34. 23-Oct-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  35. 04-Sep-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  36. 24-Jul-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  37. 13-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  38. 11-Feb-2023

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  39. 23-Jan-2023

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  40. 19-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  41. 15-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  42. 27-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  43. 15-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  44. 25-Jul-2022

    Issues

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  45. 07-May-2022

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  46. 30-Mar-2022

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  47. 11-Jan-2022

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  48. 23-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 25-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 914/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nashik allowed the application (Exh.16) to add the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner Rajendra Laxman Ghayal (who died on 27.01.2025) as parties to the case against Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. The legal heirs must be added on record within the stipulated time and file an amended petition to be supplied to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case