State Dindori Police stn Nashik vs Dattu Parasram Rokade Advocate - Bhanose Mandar D. — 231/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2), 65(1), 352. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS010054072025
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2647/2025
Filing Date
12-08-2025
Registration No
231/2025
Registration Date
12-08-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
DINDORI POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Dindori Police stn Nashik
Adv. App Sonawane Shailesh H
Respondent(s)
Dattu Parasram Rokade Advocate - Bhanose Mandar D.
Hearing History
Judge: 10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Bail Denied Accused Dattu Parasram Rokade's bail application in a POCSO case involving penetrative sexual assault of a 14-year-old minor has been rejected. The Special (POCSO) Judge found prima-facie evidence of assault supported by the victim's statements before police and magistrate, medical examination report, and witness statements, holding that a purported out-of-court compromise cannot override the gravity of charges involving a 43-year-old assaulting a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Bail Denied Accused Dattu Parasram Rokade's bail application in a POCSO case involving penetrative sexual assault of a 14-year-old minor has been rejected. The Special (POCSO) Judge found prima-facie evidence of assault supported by the victim's statements before police and magistrate, medical examination report, and witness statements, holding that a purported out-of-court compromise cannot override the gravity of charges involving a 43-year-old assaulting a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts