State Bhadrakali Police stn Nashik vs Mayur Krishna Bhavasar Advocate - Avhad Rajesh D — 202/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 305. Status: Fixing date of Hearing. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS010051102022
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2497/2022
Filing Date
27-09-2022
Registration No
202/2022
Registration Date
27-09-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
FIR Details
FIR Number
216
Police Station
BHADRAKALI POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bhadrakali Police stn Nashik
Adv. App Sonawane Shailesh H
Respondent(s)
Mayur Krishna Bhavasar Advocate - Avhad Rajesh D
Harshad Krishna Bhavsar
Krishna Trimbak Bhavasara
Nirmala Krishna Bhavsar
Hearing History
Judge: 10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing | |
| 25-03-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing | |
| 23-02-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing | |
| 11-02-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED Accused Mayur Krushna Bhavsar's bail application in Special POCSO Case No. 202/2022 has been allowed. He is released on bail upon executing personal bond and surety bond of Rs. 15,000 each for offences under IPC Sections 305, 306, 498-A, POCSO Act 2012, and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006. The court imposed stringent conditions including prohibiting contact with the informant/family, restricting movement to the informant's vicinity, and barring travel outside India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL GRANTED Accused Mayur Krushna Bhavsar's bail application in Special POCSO Case No. 202/2022 has been allowed. He is released on bail upon executing personal bond and surety bond of Rs. 15,000 each for offences under IPC Sections 305, 306, 498-A, POCSO Act 2012, and Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006. The court imposed stringent conditions including prohibiting contact with the informant/family, restricting movement to the informant's vicinity, and barring travel outside India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts