State Ambad Police stn Nashik vs Ajit Chandrakant Bhor — 163/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(n),504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS010045492022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2204/2022
Filing Date
24-08-2022
Registration No
163/2022
Registration Date
24-08-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
301
Police Station
AMBAD POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Ambad Police stn Nashik
Adv. Misar Ajay S. DGP.
Respondent(s)
Ajit Chandrakant Bhor
Hearing History
Judge: 10-DISTRICT JUDGE-5 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 09-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 06-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special POCSO Court in Nashik acquitted 23-year-old Ajit Chandrakant Bhor of charges under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 504, 506 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8, 12, finding that the prosecution failed to prove forced sexual assault. The court noted the victim's testimony denied any forceful penetration, confirmed she was in a consensual love relationship with the accused, and that they subsequently married and had a child together. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Special POCSO Court in Nashik acquitted 23-year-old Ajit Chandrakant Bhor of charges under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 504, 506 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8, 12, finding that the prosecution failed to prove forced sexual assault. The court noted the victim's testimony denied any forceful penetration, confirmed she was in a consensual love relationship with the accused, and that they subsequently married and had a child together. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts