State Ambad Police stn Nashik vs Ajit Chandrakant Bhor — 163/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(n),504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS010045492022
Filing Number
2204/2022
Filing Date
24-Aug-2022
Registration No
163/2022
Registration Date
24-Aug-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
10-District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
301
Police Station
AMBAD POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Ambad Police stn Nashik
Adv. Misar Ajay S. DGP.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ajit Chandrakant Bhor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Special POCSO Court in Nashik acquitted 23-year-old Ajit Chandrakant Bhor of charges under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 504, 506 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8, 12, finding that the prosecution failed to prove forced sexual assault. The court noted the victim's testimony denied any forceful penetration, confirmed she was in a consensual love relationship with the accused, and that they subsequently married and had a child together. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
06-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-Nov-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
16-Oct-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Sep-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-Aug-2025
Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
16-Jun-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
19-Mar-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
27-Feb-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
18-Jan-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
26-Nov-2024
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
05-Nov-2024
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
21-Oct-2024
Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Oct-2024
Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
05-Sep-2024
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-Aug-2024
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
15-Jun-2024
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-May-2024
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
03-Apr-2024
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-Feb-2024
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
17-Jan-2024
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
01-Dec-2023
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
08-Nov-2023
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Oct-2023
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
03-Oct-2023
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
11-Sep-2023
Fixing date of Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
22-Aug-2023
Fixing date of Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
19-Jul-2023
Fixing date of Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Jun-2023
Fixing date of Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
24-Apr-2023
Report
District Judge-9 And Addl.sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Apr-2023
Report
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-Mar-2023
Report
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
15-Feb-2023
Report
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Jan-2023
Report
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Jan-2023
Report
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
12-Dec-2022
Report
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
29-Nov-2022
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
19-Nov-2022
Formal Hearing
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
02-Nov-2022
Formal Hearing
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
18-Oct-2022
Formal Hearing
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
04-Oct-2022
Formal Hearing
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
22-Sep-2022
Formal Hearing
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
20-Sep-2022
Formal Hearing
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
15-Sep-2022
N.B.W._Unready
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-Sep-2022
Unready Board
District Judge-10 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
12-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 163/2022
The Special POCSO Court in Nashik acquitted 23-year-old Ajit Chandrakant Bhor of charges under IPC sections 376(2)(n), 504, 506 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8, 12, finding that the prosecution failed to prove forced sexual assault. The court noted the victim's testimony denied any forceful penetration, confirmed she was in a consensual love relationship with the accused, and that they subsequently married and had a child together. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts