State Satpur Police stn Nashik vs Vilas Jayram Borse Advocate - Shejwal Satish B. — 262/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,351(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHNS010035262025
Filing Number
1628/2025
Filing Date
19-May-2025
Registration No
262/2025
Registration Date
19-May-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
4-District Judge-7 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
SATPUR POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Satpur Police stn Nashik
Adv. Misar Ajay S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vilas Jayram Borse Advocate - Shejwal Satish B.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Vilas Jairam Borse of charges under BNS Sections 109 (attempt to murder) and 351(3) (criminal intimidation), and Bombay Police Act Section 135, finding insufficient direct evidence despite medical evidence of injuries. The court noted the complainant (production head) contradicted the FIR by testifying he had no employees and suffered injuries from a fall due to a fits condition, not assault, making corroborative medical evidence inadmissible without direct testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-7 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-7 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
12-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
11-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
04-Dec-2025
Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
17-Nov-2025
Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
04-Nov-2025
Fixing date of Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
31-Oct-2025
Fixing date of Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
15-Oct-2025
Fixing date of Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
06-Oct-2025
Fixing date of Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
15-Sep-2025
Charge
District Judge-7 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
30-Aug-2025
Charge
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
18-Aug-2025
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
30-Jul-2025
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
17-Jul-2025
Charge
District Judge-4 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
26-Jun-2025
Charge
District Judge-4 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
11-Jun-2025
Charge
District Judge-4 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
28-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 262/2025
The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Vilas Jairam Borse of charges under BNS Sections 109 (attempt to murder) and 351(3) (criminal intimidation), and Bombay Police Act Section 135, finding insufficient direct evidence despite medical evidence of injuries. The court noted the complainant (production head) contradicted the FIR by testifying he had no employees and suffered injuries from a fall due to a fits condition, not assault, making corroborative medical evidence inadmissible without direct testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts