Shantaram Ashok Bedse vs The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Adgaon Police Station, Nashik — 702/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 29th April 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHNS010027992025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

15-04-2025

Filing Number

1212/2025

Filing Date

15-04-2025

Registration No

702/2025

Registration Date

16-04-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

5-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

FIR Details

FIR Number

118

Police Station

ADGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 336(2),336(3),318(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Shantaram Ashok Bedse

Adv. Ashok Ahire Sahebrao

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Adgaon Police Station, Nashik

Hearing History

Judge: 5-DISTRICT JUDGE-3 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

29-04-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Order

27-04-2026

Order

23-04-2026

Order

13-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Additional District Judge granted bail to applicant Shantaram Ashok Bedse in a case involving charges of forgery and property fraud under BNS Sections 336(2), 336(3), and 318(2). The court recognized the dispute as essentially civil in nature but imposed strict conditions: a Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with surety, mandatory weekly presence before the investigating officer, cooperation with investigation including providing biometric data and documents, and prohibition against witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge granted bail to applicant Shantaram Ashok Bedse in a case involving charges of forgery and property fraud under BNS Sections 336(2), 336(3), and 318(2). The court recognized the dispute as essentially civil in nature but imposed strict conditions: a Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with surety, mandatory weekly presence before the investigating officer, cooperation with investigation including providing biometric data and documents, and prohibition against witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case