State thr. Mumbainaka P. S. vs Malayarasan Madasamay — 139/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 489(A),(B),(C),(E). Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHNS010026062023

N.B.W._Unready

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1323/2023

Filing Date

17-04-2023

Registration No

139/2023

Registration Date

17-04-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

3-DISTRICT JUDGE-6 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

FIR Details

FIR Number

278

Police Station

MUMBAI NAKA POLICE STATION

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 489(A),(B),(C),(E)

Petitioner(s)

State thr. Mumbainaka P. S.

Adv. Misar Ajay S. DGP.

Respondent(s)

Malayarasan Madasamay

Senthil Sekar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DISTRICT JUDGE-6 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

10-03-2026

N.B.W._Unready

19-01-2026

N.B.W._Unready

24-11-2025

N.B.W._Unready

19-08-2025

N.B.W._Unready

07-07-2025

N.B.W._Unready

Interim Orders

17-10-2023
Order on Exhibit

BAIL DENIED In Session Case No. 139 of 2023, the Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Malayarsan Madsamay, accused of counterfeiting currency notes under IPC sections 489A, 489B, 489C, and 489E. The court found a strong prima-facie case, noting the accused was caught red-handed with Rs. 4,88,000 in counterfeit notes and this was his fourth bail application, with previous applications already rejected or withdrawn. The court emphasized the serious nature of the offense against the Indian economy and lack of any substantial change in circumstances to warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

BAIL DENIED In Session Case No. 139 of 2023, the Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Malayarsan Madsamay, accused of counterfeiting currency notes under IPC sections 489A, 489B, 489C, and 489E. The court found a strong prima-facie case, noting the accused was caught red-handed with Rs. 4,88,000 in counterfeit notes and this was his fourth bail application, with previous applications already rejected or withdrawn. The court emphasized the serious nature of the offense against the Indian economy and lack of any substantial change in circumstances to warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case