Sayyed Azhar Ali vs Maharashtra Government Ghoti Police Station, Tal Igatpuri Dist Nashik — 583/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHNS010019242026

e-Filing Number

04-04-2026

Filing Number

1068/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

583/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

20-District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

09

Police Station

GHOTI POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5), 352, 351(2), 115(2), 140(3)
Arms Act Section 25, 3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sayyed Azhar Ali

    Adv. Kulkarni Shubham Sunil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra Government Ghoti Police Station, Tal Igatpuri Dist Nashik

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Reply Unready

    District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 583/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Bail Application Denied The Sessions Court at Nashik rejected the bail application of Sayyad Azhar Ali in Criminal Bail Application No. 583/2026 (dated 17.04.2026). The applicant was arrested on 20.03.2026 in connection with a serious case involving alleged kidnapping, abduction, and extortion related to a Rs. 400-crore theft of old currency notes. The court found that while a prior SIT investigation had found no offense, the subsequent CID investigation was still ongoing with evidence emerging against the applicant, and his previous absconding history (requiring a Look Out Circular) and flight risk posed a danger of tampering with witnesses or fleeing again. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case