State Ambad Police stn Nashik vs Taufiq alias Shahrukh Rafiq Shaikh Advocate - Shaikh Javed S. — 71/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),64(1),65,70. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHNS010018432025
Filing Number
794/2025
Filing Date
01-Mar-2025
Registration No
71/2025
Registration Date
01-Mar-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Nashik
Judge
10-District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
871
Police Station
AMBAD POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Ambad Police stn Nashik
Adv. Misar Ajay S. DGP.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Taufiq alias Shahrukh Rafiq Shaikh Advocate - Shaikh Javed S.
-
2.Swapnil Sanjaykumar Shewale
-
3.Bhushan Amol Kuntalwar
-
4.Ajinkya Ramakant Gosavi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Special (POCSO) Court in Nashik acquitted all four accused persons—Taufique @ Shahrukh Shafique Shaikh, Swapnil Sanjaykumar Shewale, Bhushan Amol Kuntalwar, and Ajinkya Ramakant Gosavi—of charges under BNS sections 137(2), 70 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, finding that the victim's own testimony contradicted the prosecution's allegations and that circumstantial evidence (forensic reports, fingerprints) failed to prove the alleged gang rape. The court found the prosecution had not proven its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
01-Apr-2026
Judgment
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
30-Mar-2026
Judgment
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
20-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
18-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
17-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
16-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
25-Nov-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
21-Nov-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Nov-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
28-Oct-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
08-Oct-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Sep-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
26-Aug-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
13-Aug-2025
N.B.W._Ready
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
31-Jul-2025
N.B.W._Ready
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
21-Jul-2025
N.B.W._Ready
District Judge-6 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
08-Jul-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
24-Jun-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
10-Jun-2025
Hearing
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
22-May-2025
Hearing
District Judge-4 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
15-May-2025
Hearing
District Judge-4 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
08-May-2025
Fixing date of Hearing
District Judge-4 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
30-Apr-2025
Charge
District Judge-4 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
23-Apr-2025
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
05-Apr-2025
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
25-Mar-2025
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik
-
19-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2025
Summary The Special (POCSO) Court in Nashik acquitted all four accused persons—Taufique @ Shahrukh Shafique Shaikh, Swapnil Sanjaykumar Shewale, Bhushan Amol Kuntalwar, and Ajinkya Ramakant Gosavi—of charges under BNS sections 137(2), 70 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, finding that the victim's own testimony contradicted the prosecution's allegations and that circumstantial evidence (forensic reports, fingerprints) failed to prove the alleged gang rape. The court found the prosecution had not proven its case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts