Vishal Chandrakant Pawar vs Ambad Police Station, Nashik — 295/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHNS010012552026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

657/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

295/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

4-DISTRICT JUDGE-7 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

753

Police Station

AMBAD POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Vishal Chandrakant Pawar

Adv. chetan Deshmukh

Respondent(s)

Ambad Police Station, Nashik

Hearing History

Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-7 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Arguments

02-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted bail to Vishal Chandrakant Pawar, finding the complainant had suppressed crucial documents including a Memorandum of Understanding and Power of Attorney showing a consensual business arrangement to challenge her deceased husband's will in exchange for a 60-40% benefit split. The court noted the two-year delay in filing the FIR, lack of actual physical injury despite allegations of grievous hurt, and that Rs. 21 lakhs were received by the complainant from the applicant, suggesting the complaint was filed to avoid repaying this amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Vishal Chandrakant Pawar, finding the complainant had suppressed crucial documents including a Memorandum of Understanding and Power of Attorney showing a consensual business arrangement to challenge her deceased husband's will in exchange for a 60-40% benefit split. The court noted the two-year delay in filing the FIR, lack of actual physical injury despite allegations of grievous hurt, and that Rs. 21 lakhs were received by the complainant from the applicant, suggesting the complaint was filed to avoid repaying this amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case