Balabai Anil Koli vs Nobody — 13/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP. M.A. - Misc. Application in Motor Accident Claims

CNR: MHNS010011392026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

550/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

5-District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balabai Anil Koli

    Adv. Mohamed Tayyab Sayyed

  2. 2.Mahadev Anil Koli

    Adv. Mohamed Tayyab Sayyed

  3. 3.Swapnil Anil Koli

    Adv. Mohamed Tayyab Sayyed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nobody

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The MACT Nashik allowed the application of Smt. Balabai Anil Koli and applicant No. 3 to release Rs. 3,00,000 from their fixed deposits held in Punjab National Bank, citing the urgency of upcoming marriage expenses and finding no malafide intent. Applicant No. 2's fixed deposit amount was retained, while applicants 1 and 3 were entitled to immediate release of their respective amounts with accrued interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Report

    District Judge-3 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The MACT Nashik allowed the application of Smt. Balabai Anil Koli and applicant No. 3 to release Rs. 3,00,000 from their fixed deposits held in Punjab National Bank, citing the urgency of upcoming marriage expenses and finding no malafide intent. Applicant No. 2's fixed deposit amount was retained, while applicants 1 and 3 were entitled to immediate release of their respective amounts with accrued interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case