Pawan Chandrakant Pawar vs State Ambad Police stn Nashik — 245/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHNS010009432026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

555/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

245/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik

Judge

4-DISTRICT JUDGE-7 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

753

Police Station

AMBAD POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 363, 341, 342, 364-A, 384, 385, 354, 324, 326, 34, 504, 506

Petitioner(s)

Pawan Chandrakant Pawar

Adv. chetan Deshmukh

Respondent(s)

State Ambad Police stn Nashik

Hearing History

Judge: 4-DISTRICT JUDGE-7 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, NASHIK

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Reply/Say

02-03-2026

Reply/Say

27-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Pawan Chandrakant Pawar in a case involving allegations of extortion, intimidation, and forged documents related to a Power of Attorney over an elderly woman's property. The court found that the complainant had suppressed crucial documents (the Power of Attorney and a Memorandum of Understanding showing a 60-40% profit-sharing arrangement) and had already received ₹21 lakhs from the applicant, concluding the complaint appeared motivated by her desire to avoid repaying borrowed money rather than addressing genuine criminal conduct. Bail was granted on condition of furnishing ₹25,000 surety and attending weekly police investigation sessions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Pawan Chandrakant Pawar in a case involving allegations of extortion, intimidation, and forged documents related to a Power of Attorney over an elderly woman's property. The court found that the complainant had suppressed crucial documents (the Power of Attorney and a Memorandum of Understanding showing a 60-40% profit-sharing arrangement) and had already received ₹21 lakhs from the applicant, concluding the complaint appeared motivated by her desire to avoid repaying borrowed money rather than addressing genuine criminal conduct. Bail was granted on condition of furnishing ₹25,000 surety and attending weekly police investigation sessions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Nashik All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case